With the unlikelihood of definitive scientific evidence emerging any time soon, the debate over the role of fuel emissions in the rise of global warming will rage on for an extended period.
Along these lines, it is no surprise that oil companies and car makers have been able to locate and publicize alleged scientific experts who claim little or no correlation between human beings' endless consumption and subsequent waste and the rise in the level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
On the other side of the battle are environmental advocates who are adamant in their position to curb the torrid pace of consumption prevalent in most countries in the world. The economic sacrifices we would have to make, they offer, are necessary for the survival of ours and countless other species.
I think the relevant question to be asked here is not the undefinable link between emissions and global warming, but rather this: Are human beings adequately performing their roles as caretakers of the planet for the generations yet to come? As a species, are we consuming in a responsible manner that will help ensure the health and prosperity of our children and grandchildren?
Unfortunately, the answer to this question is clear: Absolutely not. The selfishness and ignorance of society, most notably in the United States, is as disheartening as it is dangerous. What's more, the seeming indifference of younger Americans toward this issue is particularly alarming.
The availability of alternative fuel technologies, combined with a recent poll indicating a willingness by a majority of Americans to pay more for gasoline, gives us at least a glimmer of hope for the future. In addition, there are many other possibilities that may help us to strike a balance between our patterns of consumption and need for economic prosperity and the safety and security of the fragile ecosystem that sustains us and belongs not to us, but to, the generations that will follow. What about alternative tax programs that would focus on resource consumption rather than income dollars? What about strictly enforced legislation on gas-guzzling vehicles and individuals?
The current situation is not acceptable. We have an obligation to the future that cannot continue to be disregarded.
Kevin Corcoran
Philadelphia
Thursday, December 4, 1997. Letter to the Editor. Philadelphia Inquirer